Sunday, October 20, 2019
Harriet Tubman on the Twenty Dollar Bill
Harriet Tubman on the Twenty Dollar Bill Harriet Tubman was an amazing woman - she escaped slavery, freed hundreds of others, and even worked as a spy during the Civil War. Now sheââ¬â¢s going to grace the front of the twenty dollar bill. But is this move progress or pandering? The Current State of Currency The faces of United States currency have a few things in common. They feature prominent figures in American history. Figures such as George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, and Benjamin Franklin have been pictured on our paper money, and some of our coins, for decades. These individuals were prominent in the founding and/or leadership of the nation. Not surprising, money is sometimes referred to colloquially as ââ¬Å"dead presidents,â⬠despite the fact that some figures on the money, such as Alexander Hamilton and Benjamin Franklin, were never presidents. In some ways, that fact does not matter much to the public. Hamilton, Franklin, and the others are larger than life figures in the history of the founding of the nation. It makes sense that the currency would feature them. However, what Washington, Lincoln, Hamilton, and Franklin also have in common is that they are prominent white men. Indeed, very few women, and fewer people of color more generally, have been featured on U.S. currency. For example, prominent womenââ¬â¢s suffragist Susan B. Anthony was featured on a United States dollar coin minted from 1979 to 1981; however, the series was halted due to poor public reception, only to be reissued again for a short period in 1999. The following year another dollar coin, this time featuring the Native American guide and interpreter from the Shoshone nation, Sacagewa, who led Lewis and Clark on their expedition. Like the Susan B. Anthony coin, the golden dollar coin featuring Sacagewa was unpopular with the public and is of primary interest to collectors. But it looks like things are about to change. Now several women, including Harriet Tubman, Sojourner Truth, Susan B. Anthony, Lucretia Mott, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Marian Anderson, and Alice Paul will be gracing other denominations of paper money in the next upcoming years. How Did It Happen? A group called Women on 20s has been advocating to replace former president Andrew Jackson on the twenty dollar bill. The non-profit, grassroots organization had one major goal: to convince President Obama that now is the time to put a womanââ¬â¢s face on Americaââ¬â¢s paper currency. Women on 20s used an online election format with two rounds of voting that let the public choose a nominee from an original slate of 15 inspiring women from American history, women such as Wilma Mankiller, Rosa Parks, Eleanor Roosevelt, Margaret Sanger, Harriet Tubman and others. Over the course of 10 weeks, more than half a million people cast votes, with Harriet Tubman ultimately emerging as the winner. On May 12, 2015, Women On 20s presented a petition to President Obama with the election results. The group also encouraged him to instruct Secretary of the Treasury Jacob Lew to use his authority to make this currency change in time to have a new bill in circulation before the 100th anniversary of womenââ¬â¢s suffrage in 2020. And, after a year of public polls, discussion, and agitation, Harriet Tubman was chosen to be the face of the new twenty dollar bill. Why the $20 Bill? Itââ¬â¢s all about the centennial of the 19th amendment, which granted (most but not all) women the right to vote. 2020 marks the 100th anniversary of the passage of the 19th Amendment and Women on 20s sees having women on the currency as the most appropriate way commemorate that milestone, arguing that ââ¬Å"Letââ¬â¢s make the names of female ââ¬Ëdisruptersââ¬â¢- the ones who led the way and dared to think differently as well-known as their male counterparts. In the process, maybe it will get a little easier to see the way to full political, social and economic equality for women. And hopefully, it wont take another century to realize the motto inscribed on our money: E pluribus unum, or ââ¬ËOut of many, one.ââ¬â¢Ã¢â¬ The move to replace Jackson makes sense. While he has been hailed throughout history because of his lowly beginnings and rise to the White House and his conservative views on spending, he was also an unabashed racist who engineered the removal of indigenous people from the southeast - also known as the infamous Trail of Tearsà - to make way for white settlers and the expansion of slavery because of his belief in Manifest Destiny. He is responsible for some of the darkest chapters in American history. The groupââ¬â¢s focus on putting women on paper money is a key one. Women had been featured on coins and not the frequently used ones such as the quarter yet those coins have been unpopular and have gone out of circulation quickly. Putting women on more frequently used paper money means that millions will use this currency. It means that womenââ¬â¢s faces will be staring back at us while we buy groceries or tip servers or make it rain at the strip club. And instead of it being ââ¬Å"all about the Benjamins,â⬠it may be all about the Tubmans. Who Is Harriet Tubman? Harriet Tubmanà was a slave, a conductor on the Underground Railroad, a nurse, a spy, and a suffragist. She was born into slavery in the 1820s in Dorchester, Maryland and named Araminta by her family. Tubmanââ¬â¢s family was fractured by slavery and her own life was marred by violence and pain. For example, when she was 13, she received a blow to her from her master that resulted in a lifetime of illness, including headaches, narcolepsy, and seizures. In her 20s, she decided to take the ultimate risk: fleeing slavery. To call Tubman brave is an understatement. She not only made the perilous escape from slavery herself, she also returned South dozens of times to free hundreds of others. She used disguises to evade and outwit slave catchers and never lost a single person on the flight to freedom. During the Civil War, Tubman worked as a nurse, cook, scout, and spy. In fact, in 1863, she led an armed raid that freed 700 slaves in South Carolina on the Combahee River. Harriet Tubman has the great distinction of being the first woman ever to lead a military expedition in American history. After the civil war, Tubman was an avid suffragist who worked with high profile womenââ¬â¢s rights advocates such as Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton, lecturing on the right to vote. Later in life, after retiring to a farm outside of Auburn, New York, and after a long and arduous process of appeals, she secured a pension for herself of $20 per month for her Civil War efforts which makes it all the more ironic that she will now grace the front of the $20.à Is This Progress or Pandering? Harriet Tubman is undoubtedly a great American hero. She fought for the oppressed and put her own life and body on the line numerous times for others. As a Black woman freedom fighter, her life is a primary example of what it means to fight intersectionallyà - taking into account various intersecting oppressions. She represents some of the most marginalized in our history and her name and memory should be on the lips of schoolchildren everywhere. But should she be on the $20? Many have hailed the decision to replace Andrew Jackson with Harriet Tubman, citing the move as evidence of the great progress our nation has made. Indeed, during part of her life Tubman was legally recognized as chattel - that is, movable property like a candlestick, or a chair, or cattle. She could have been legally bought or sold with U.S. currency. Therefore, goes the argument, the fact that she will now be the face of money shows how far we have come. Others have remarked that this same irony is why Tubman should not be on the $20. The argument is that a woman who risked her life countless times in order to free others, and who spent her years advocating for social change should not be associated with something as debased as money. Also, some argue that the fact that she was considered property for much of her life makes her inclusion on the twenty dollar bill hypocritical and distasteful. Still more insist that Tubman on the $20 simply pays lip service to issues of racism and inequality. In a moment where activists are trying to make the claim that Black Lives Matter and when systemic oppression has still left Blacks on the bottom of the social totem pole, some wonder about how useful it is to have Harriet Tubman on the $20. Others have argued that paper currency should only be reserved for government officials and presidents.à This is a particularly interesting moment to place Harriet Tubman on the $20. On the one hand, the U.S. has seen an amazing amount of social change in the past few decades. From having a Black president to the passage of gay marriage to the rapidly shifting racial demographics of the country, the U.S. is transforming to a new nation. However, some of the nationââ¬â¢s old guard is not going down with a fight. The increasing popularity of ultra-right wing conservatism, white supremacy groups, and even the troubling rise of Donald Trump speaks to much of the uneasiness a substantial part of the country has with the social sea of change going on. Some of the vitriolic reactions to the news of Tubman on the twenty dollar bill underscore that racism and sexism are far from obsolete. Interestingly, while Women on 20s did gain a victory for their campaign by getting Harriet Tubman on the $20, Andrew Jackson is not really going anywhere: he will still be on the back of the note. Perhaps in the case of women gracing U.S. paper currency, it is a situation where the more things change, the more things stay the same.
Saturday, October 19, 2019
Parti4-comments3 Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words
Parti4-comments3 - Essay Example When writing a narrative essay, theà pre-writingà and revising stages become handy, in that they allow for collection of ideas as well as editing them (Clemens, n.d). Theà pre-writingà session of a narrative essayà enablesà the writerà toà putà precisely,à the information and verbs of the storyà together. While as the narrator gathers information in theà pre-writingà session, he edits the information in the revising session (Clemens, n.d). Then, the writerââ¬â¢s aim of putting across his intended message is achieved indeed, following a goodà pre-writingà and revision exercise. Usually, the narrativeââ¬â¢s point of focus is evident in the first sentence, and eventually appears in the closing sentence, thereby driving the point home. Narratives are purely reliant on personal experience and,à therefore, going through the stage ofà pre-writingà and revising ensures that only the important parts, relevant to the story are written.à After the narrator has achieved a goodà pre-writingà and editing sessionà and obtaining the clarity intended for the reader, the outcome is usually a notable impact to the reader.à Notably, a narrative essaysà writer does not only center on giving an interesting story, but also focuses on exhibiting the influence or the change brought about by the life experience and to impact the audienceââ¬â¢s mind for
Balance-of-Power theory in World War I & II Research Paper
Balance-of-Power theory in World War I & II - Research Paper Example While WWI was more re suit of growing tension and competition, WWI was caused by direct aggression (Russel 130). The swelling of nationalist pride that began in the 19th century and endured into the 20th induced both wars at least partly. The assassination of Franz Ferdinand and the conflict between on Serbia and Austria, for example, was a result of Serbian nationalism and was fueled by a longing for self-determination. World War II was also begun by nationalism, especially that of the Germans. It was this German nationalism and desire for sellââ¬Ë-determination that fueled Hitler's campaigns to take over Europe. Both wars were sparked by the upset of the delicate balance of power in Europe. In WWI, tension between the big powers of the time- Germany Britain Russia and France- upset this balance, likewise the balance was tipped ones again when Hitlerââ¬â¢s campaign began and the German ââ¬ËReichââ¬â¢ began to expand. While WWI began with a conflict between small countrie s, which then branched out through the tangled alliances of Europe to other larger countries. WWII began with the big powers. WWI can be traced back to the rivalry between Austria-Hungary and Serbia. Over time, large powers such as Russia and Germany stepped in to defend their allies and this enraged oven more countries. The inception of WWI was therefore like a 'ripple' effect beginning quite small, and then expanding. WWII was quite the opposite, beginning with the brutal campaigns and expansion of revisionist powers Germany and Japan. If WWI began with a ripple, WWII began with explosion. Large European powers got involved in WW1 because they wanted to protect their allies, not because of direct acts of aggression against them. WWII was marked by such acts daggrassim as the bombing of Pearl Harbor, the invasion of Poland, and the Rape of Hackling. While WWI began largely because of tension between countries that had been caused by competition over reign markets and colonies (Paul et al 112). Largely Fascism and a thirst for revenge began WWII. Hitlerââ¬â¢s attacks on Europe and the transformation of Germany into a dictatorship was made possible because the German people were vulnerable and scarred by the previous war. These wars could be considered one continual conflict that was not properly resolved in the interim. The nationalism, alliances, and aggression that led to both wars points out that their roots were quite similar. The lesson learned is that the resolutions or lack of it has therefore shaped the way we make peace today. Both World War I and II were preceded by large armament buildups. In WWI, in Europe they were of a long-standing nature and in response to balance-of-power exigencies which usually placed a two to four times greater per capita burden on the populace than in the United States Germanyââ¬Ës per capita burden was 7.65 times more than that of the US. There was no doubt that it was a nation poised for war. There was little suppo rt for a contrary opinion in both world wars; eminent expenses grew beyond the security needs of the nations. Rates immediately prior to both wars were of such a magnitude as to strongly suggest the imminence of war. In both these cases, inhibitory controls on armaments could have prevented wars of the sizes that occurred. For example, Treaty of versatile prohibitions on Germany and the League of Nations treaties vetoed by Great Britain in the 1923-25 period. What distinguished the occurrence of WWI and WWII entailed the dependence on the military, and the inhibitory controls. The choices made were military ones: balance of power and Maginot Lincoln neither ease did these methods perform, as intended, to prevent war. In terms of the present model in the WWI-WWII interim period, German DT was not
Friday, October 18, 2019
Power & Privilege - Fashioning a plan Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words
Power & Privilege - Fashioning a plan - Essay Example The paper "Power & Privilege - Fashioning a plan" is a personal expression of my own belief system along with a strategy for affecting change. I found the articles by these two writers, as well as those of Johnson, to be interesting; but I find myself somewhat critical of their bias. I agree with Peters that ââ¬Å"[s]ystems and institutions that regulate class location are much more powerful than individualsâ⬠(Peters 1). There are certainly individuals who work hard and try to improve their lives and situations and are prevented from achieving complete success due to the resistance of the powerful; and social change efforts should be made to address those inequities. I canââ¬â¢t accept, however, that ââ¬Å"everyone deserves what you have; you just happen to have itâ⬠or her idea that ââ¬Å"empowered people enrich themselves by leaving exploitative, dehumanizing work to othersâ⬠. This position implies too much intentionality to what often is random placement with in the socio-economic spectrum or the result of individual choice. As James and Robinson point out, ââ¬Å"there are necessarily differences between people. We all perceive these differences and make judgments about others based on them...â⬠(xv), and this is exactly what Peters does; she makes judgments about those employed in menial jobs from her perspective of upper-middle class privilege. She would never be happy bagging groceries; ergo, no one else can be either. Thatââ¬â¢s just a little too simplistic. As for Alperovitz, putting his political partisanship aside.... As Schultz notes, "social reformers and activists would be better served by reconsidering how much hope was placed upon working through the courts versus investing more time to win critical victories thorough the political process" (9). The legal system certainly has its place in addressing the suppression of classes of individuals, but the political system is a better tool for social policy. It also has the benefit of being the voice of the people, rather than that of an activist judiciary or single governmental branch. What I have learned. From this course, I have come to a fresh understanding of power and privilege generally, the impact of the misuse of those concepts on the radically disenfranchised, as well as my own place within the dynamic. I don't believe that the positions taken by authors on either extreme are realistic. An individual's plight is not solely the result of his or her own choices, but neither is it necessarily the intentional infliction of harm by a bad system. Certainly, many individuals must shoulder the burden of their own choices and it is far too easy to blame the system for their condition. On the other hand, there really are those people who are neither powerful nor privileged as a result of systemic oppression or neglect. As I look at my own standing in society and the privileges I enjoy, I am aware of those who have more and those who have less. I think that everyone is both privileged and disenfranchised on some level. The distinction for me lies within the individua l circumstances under consideration. The middle-class college student has more inherited privilege than the impoverished gang member, naturally. I am
Optional subject ( apple is recommended ) Assignment
Optional subject ( apple is recommended ) - Assignment Example I will also take reference from Lance Whitney and Josh Lowensohnââ¬â¢s articles that would put light on the tactics used by Apple. Apple has emerged as a renowned and very popular company in the recent past due to its innovative and high quality products. Apple has always tried to come up with customerââ¬â¢s expectations with it continually improving products. It has always looked to bring innovation that has helped the company to compete with other brands. The organizational structure of the company is designed in such a way that it promotes competition and encourages employees to present new ideas. I think it was a very clever move by Apple to adopt innovative strategy with appealing applications as its competitors were not bringing much innovation in their products. Introduction of iphone was an example of such innovation, which had brought a revolution in the technological world. iphone helped Apple to register revenues of $65,225 million, increasing by 52% in fiscal year 2010. The company also adopted a strategy to market its product worldwide and not restricting it to a particular place, which helped the company to gain significant market share. Research and development is also a very important aspect for the company. Apple lays strong focus on research and development in the company and always come up with new ideas and suggestion that help the company to develop new products. When the company was entering into the Chinese market, initially it did not get a good response, but extensive research helped the company to make few changes in the product. These changes made it easy for Apple to introduce its product in China, which became a great success. The focus on research and development helps the company to compete with its competitor very efficiently. Initially, when Apple introduced its smart phones in the market, it was a totally new concept, so it decided to charge higher prices due to the advanced features of its
Thursday, October 17, 2019
Analysis and synthesis essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words
Analysis and synthesis - Essay Example In summary it described Facebook, presented Facebook usersââ¬â¢ dislike on Facebookââ¬â¢s new design, mentioned Facebookââ¬â¢s financial challenges and Facebook usersââ¬â¢ love-hate relationship with Facebook. The article does not end there, it also has advises on how to properly use the site. One advice given was to take advantage of privacy settings to manage networks in order for them to speak discreetly to certain friends, such as family, close friends, co-workers as opposed to other ââ¬Ëfriendsââ¬â¢ such as bosses or professional colleagues. Barton told the an amusing story wherein an employee was fired due to his obscene status message regarding to his disappointment in his work which the boss has read because he is his ââ¬Ëfriendââ¬â¢ in facebook. The virtual world article on the other hand was brilliant in that if one missed to read the title she would have understood it as real life drama. Unlike the Facebook article which was very straightforward, the author took on a different approach. At first, it narrated a story of two avatars that were married and had a property together. The amusing thing was that it was slightly exaggerated though on a healthy level wherein it is entertaining to the readers. The story built up the more serious issue tackled by the paper- access and control. It compared the case of one real person having real, tangible property to some virtual one who has virtual property. The former is protected by law, specifically, property rights. The later on the other hand have the mediation of the network of software and the owner of the virtual environment who has interests to protect as well. It gave examples of real life people who encountered problems regarding accounts (Email, social networking sites and gaming accounts) of their family, close friend or even virtual partners who passed away. It went on to citing the companiesââ¬â¢ good reasons in
Urban Planning Perspectives Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 1
Urban Planning Perspectives - Essay Example In addition, regardless of the answers of the political authorities or stakeholders to the foregoing, additional fundamental planning principles or perspectives can be included. For instance, one planning principle that can be added is that urbanizing areas must also anticipate the needs of the future. Thus, for example, road widths must anticipate the traffic volumes of tomorrow and car volumes rather than the traffic volumes of the present. The needs assumed for planning must assume the needs of the future or perhaps a generation ahead rather than assuming only the needs of the current generation. The assumption on the demand for water, for example, must also factor in the needs of future generations rather than merely assume the needs of today. Planning must anticipate possible problems that can emerge. Another planning principle that will have to decided upon by political authorities pertain to what planning principle should be adopted by planning authorities pertaining to sustenance. Shall the planning authority assume national and/or international interdependence or sustenance or should the planning authority assume or adopt the principle of self-sufficient or self-sustaining urban areas? In general, urban areas have generally assumed that regions and areas are interdependent and, thus, did not attempt that all the needs of the city are satisfied by the urban area or the city itself. However, it is conceivable that we can find civil society groups lobbying that the city or urbanizing area adopt a planning principle aiming at self-sufficient urban areas or self-sufficient cities. The ââ¬Å"self-sufficientâ⬠cities or urbanizing areas are supposedly able to acquire its sustenance entirely or solely from the city or the urbanizing area itself. Another planning principle that will have to decide by the political authorities in the urbanizing area or city is on the weight of function versus aesthetics in planning. Should the urbanizing area or city
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)